Last updated: June 30, 2026
Binghe Soft may use software tools, including AI-assisted drafting or editing tools, as part of the content repair and publication process. This policy explains the role those tools can play and the standards that still apply to published pages.
AI assistance does not remove editorial responsibility. A published article should be readable, useful, and checked for obvious problems. The site should not publish raw model output that contains chat artifacts, inflated claims, fake sources, generic conclusions, or internal production notes.
How AI Tools May Be Used
AI tools may help with drafting, summarizing an old article, restructuring headings, suggesting title improvements, checking word count, identifying thin pages, or removing repetitive phrasing. They may also help create a first draft of trust-page wording that an editor then reviews.
AI tools should not be treated as a source of truth. They can make mistakes, invent details, overstate certainty, or produce wording that sounds polished but says little. For that reason, editors should review factual claims, links, names, dates, and any statement that could affect a reader’s decision.
Human Editing Standard
Published content should sound like a human editor worked on it. Binghe Soft avoids overused AI patterns such as exaggerated importance, vague expert references, forced lists of three, generic positive endings, and repetitive sentence structures. A longer page should answer more real questions, not merely add filler.
Client Links And Existing URLs
When AI tools are used to improve older posts, the original slug and required outbound URLs should remain unchanged unless a specific change is approved. That protects client URLs, redirects, and older campaign work while still allowing the article body to become more useful.
Disclosure And Limits
Binghe Soft does not label every edit or rewrite with a separate AI disclosure. The important standard is editorial accountability: no fabricated facts, no invented credentials, no hidden internal notes, and no unsupported professional advice. If an article uses synthetic media or a special AI-generated asset in a way that could affect reader understanding, the page should disclose that clearly.
Reader Reports
If a page looks like raw AI output, contains a false claim, or includes an internal prompt artifact, report it to [email protected] with the URL and the issue.
Quality Checks Before Publishing
Before AI-assisted content is published, the editor should check that the page has no prompt text, no fake citations, no placeholder claims, no invented names, and no statements that make the site look more authoritative than it is. The article should also keep any required client URLs intact and should not turn a neutral informational page into a fake review.
Images And Synthetic Media
If AI-generated images or heavily edited media are used in the future, the image should fit the topic and should not mislead readers about a real product, person, place, or event. For normal article cards, existing licensed or uploaded media is preferred when it fits the topic.
Archive Repair Use
The most common acceptable use of AI assistance on Binghe Soft is archive repair. That can mean turning a thin old article into a clearer guide, making headings more readable, or identifying missing metadata. The editor still decides what to publish and checks that required links, slugs, and disclosures survive the rewrite.