Last updated: June 30, 2026
Binghe Soft wants the site to be usable for readers on common desktop and mobile devices. Accessibility is part of that work. A site can have good content and still fail readers if the text is hard to read, the layout overflows on a phone, the form is confusing, or images and links do not behave predictably.
This Accessibility Statement explains the practical standard we use for Binghe Soft and the feedback process for problems. It is not a claim that every page has been formally audited against every accessibility requirement. The site includes older posts and inherited WordPress behavior, so accessibility repair is handled as an ongoing process.
Current Goals
The site should use readable text sizes, clear headings, strong contrast, visible links, working forms, and layouts that do not require horizontal scrolling on normal mobile screens. Navigation should be predictable. Article cards should not become blank blocks. Images should load without broken boxes, and forms should identify required fields clearly enough for a reader to complete them.
The contact form includes fields for name, email address, subject, and message. The email field is important because it gives the editorial desk a way to reply when a request needs follow-up. The form also includes spam protection, which can sometimes affect usability. If the form does not work, readers can email [email protected] directly.
Known Limitations
Older articles may have images with weak alternative text, headings that need cleanup, or formatting that was created before the current theme. Some embedded content, such as map embeds or outside media, may not be fully controlled by Binghe Soft. Caching can also briefly show an older version of a page after a repair.
Repair Process
Accessibility issues are handled as part of the broader quality process. When a page is reviewed, editors check mobile rendering, image behavior, links, headings, spacing, and basic readability. Larger technical issues may require theme changes rather than page edits.
Feedback
If you have trouble using a page, send the URL, device, browser, and a short description of the issue to [email protected]. If possible, include what you were trying to do and what stopped you. We use that information to prioritize fixes.
Specific Checks During Page Review
During a page review, the editor should check whether the main heading is visible, the search form fits on mobile, footer links remain readable, article cards do not have large blank spaces, and images keep their proportions. The site should also avoid tiny text inside buttons and avoid important links that only work when a hover state is available.
Accessibility repair also overlaps with performance. A slow page, a broken image, or a layout that jumps while loading can make the site harder to use. For that reason, accessibility checks should happen together with speed checks, image checks, and mobile screenshots.
Third-Party Limits
Some accessibility issues may come from third-party embeds, browser extensions, advertising scripts, or WordPress plugins outside the direct text of an article. When that happens, the fix may involve replacing the embed, changing a plugin setting, or choosing a simpler layout. The goal is practical access, not keeping a feature that makes the page harder to use.